AMD Looks to Qimonda For GDDR5 Memory

AMD’s next generation Radeon graphics card to get a boost from GDDR5

Although NVIDIA may be grabbing headlines lately with leaked details of its next generation GeForce graphics cards, AMD isn’t exactly standing still with its Radeon offerings. ATI is preparing its Radeon HD 4800 series GPUs which will replace the existing HD 3800 lineup.

While the HD 4800 Series is rumored to feature GPGPU physics and HDMI 7.1 surround sound pass-through, today we were made privy of one concrete aspect of the new cards: the onboard memory. Qimonda contacted DailyTech earlier this morning with the news that they will supply AMD with GDDR5 memory chips for the reinvigorated Radeon family.

“The days of monolithic mega-chips are gone. Being first to market with GDDR in our next-generation architecture, AMD is able to deliver incredible performance using more cost-effective GPUs,” remarked Rick Bergman, AMD Senior Vice President and General Manager, Graphics Product Group. “AMD believes that GDDR5 is the optimal way to drive performance gains while being mindful of power consumption. We’re excited about the potential GDDR5 brings to the table for innovative game development and even more exciting game play.”

The high-speed memory chips are 512Mbit and offer bandwidth of up to 4.0Gbps. In preparing for AMD’s June launch, mass production of the new GDDR5 chips has already commenced and are shipping in volume.

“We are very proud to supply AMD with GDDR5 volume shipments only six months after first product samples have been delivered,” said Robert Feurle, Qimonda AG’s Vice President of the DRAM Business Unit. “This is a further milestone in our successful GDDR5 roadmap and underlines our predominant position as innovator and leader in the graphics DRAM market.”

“Qimonda’s strong GDDR5 roadmap convinced us to choose them as a primary technology partner for our GDDR5 GPU launch,” added AMD’s Joe Macri. “Both the early availability of first samples and volume shipments added great value to the development and launch of our upcoming high-performance GPU.”

Taken from : dailytech.com


Flip-Flop? Microsoft Back in Talks With Yahoo

Microsoft discusses alternatives to a full buyout with Yahoo

Yahoo is currently under a lot of scrutiny following the breakdown of takeover talks with Microsoft.  After Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang failed to assuage the fears of its shareholders, the shareholders struck back, led by billionaire investor Carl Icahn.  Icahn bought up a large stake in Yahoo last week and proceeded to push forward a new slate of directors, which if elected, could guarantee a sale to Microsoft.

Microsoft, however, insisted that it did not want to deal with Yahoo anymore and looked to achieve independent success.  However, the giant also would be foolish to let this opportunity pass, and is now softening its previous stance slightly.

It announced that it is talks with Yahoo about alternatives to a complete buyout.  A statement from Microsoft describes:

In light of developments since the withdrawal of the Microsoft proposal to acquire Yahoo! Inc., Microsoft announced that it is continuing to explore and pursue its alternatives to improve and expand its online services and advertising business.  Microsoft is considering and has raised with Yahoo! an alternative that would involve a transaction with Yahoo! but not an acquisition of all of Yahoo!  Microsoft is not proposing to make a new bid to acquire all of Yahoo! at this time, but reserves the right to reconsider that alternative depending on future developments and discussions that may take place with Yahoo! or discussions with shareholders of Yahoo! or Microsoft or with other third parties.

The last sentence serves dually as a disclaimer and as a warning to Yahoo, as it seems to allude to the shareholder drama with Icahn.  Barring a complete sale, though, what options does Microsoft have?  It could either work out a partial acquisition, much like its stake acquisition in Facebook, only on a much bigger scale.  Yahoo and Microsoft could also work out some sort of joint online venture deal, in which they shared services.

Microsoft, however, was quick to warn in its statement that nothing is set in stone and that discussions may be dropped at any time.

When negotiations between Microsoft and Yahoo initially ended, Microsoft was offering a maximum price of $33 per share, while Yahoo said the offer significantly undervalued the company, and would not accept less than $37 per share.  Yahoo stock has seen rollercoaster action over the last couple weeks and is currently at $28.00 per share.

Analysts generally agree that Microsoft desperately needs to acquire Yahoo or make other major changes to succeed online, and avoid getting trampled by ever-energized competitor Google.  To date, since 2005, Microsoft’s online operations have lost more than $1.5B USD.  Kevin Johnson, the head of Microsoft’s online division acknowledges these problems, stating in a corporate email to employees, “The fact is that we are not where we want to be in this business yet and we’ve been in this position longer than we’d all like.”

A big date for the Yahoo and Microsoft drama could come July 3, at the annual Yahoo shareholder meeting.  If a deal is not made before then, Icahn will likely try to get shareholders to vote on the challenger board slate.  If he succeeds, it would certainly dramatically alter the picture of negotiations.

Taken from : dailytech.com

Building An “Iron Man” Pt. II: Jet-powered, Winged Flight

“It’s just my job five days a week, A rocket man, a rocket man”; New technology brings superstrength, can more new technology bring exoskeleton based flight to complete the “Iron Man”?

The summer’s hottest blockbuster is the superhero flick “Iron Man” which stars Robert Downey Jr. as weapons designer turned superhero Tony Stark.  In part one of this two part series, we looked at the advances made in building exoskeletons, particularly Sarcos Inc.’s new Sarcos suit which can lift over 500 lbs, is maneuverable enough to handle stairs, and can run 30 minutes untethered.

Having a super-powered suit is great, but aside from his power, the comic book character “Iron Man” had two other key attributes — speed and flight.  Without it, Iron Man would go from a superhero, to just plain super slow.

Fortunately there are some promising technologies to give the exoskeleton fighting suit of the future super speed and flight.  This article, the second part of this two part series, seeks to examine a couple of them.

First in the category of super speed comes the “rocket boots” from Russia, which after decades is nearing perfection.  Videos of the boots can be viewed here (in Russian language) [1][2][3].

The boots also go by the names “Power Boots”, “Seven League Boots”, “Quickwalker Boots”, or commonly “Saigak Boots”.  Saigak is Russian for a fast kind of elk.

The boots allow the user to run at up to 22 mph, with little fatigue, yet are delicate enough to climb stairs quickly.  They also get 70 MPG.  The boots are powered by tiny diesel/gas burning pistons.  They can carry 1/3 of a cup of fuel and propel the user 3 miles.  Using the boots, you can also jump much higher than the standard man.

Viktor Gordyev, a Russian who attended the University at Ufa in the Southern Urals, originally got the idea for the boots when sweating out laps in his college’s physical education requirement in 1974.  It is unclear exactly when they were invented and perfected, except that  Gordyev’s work was classified by the Soviet government.  In 1994 the project was finally declassified, and Gordyev was able to market his work.

Unfortunately, his company went under in 2006, after a lack of interest from investors. A demonstration at Disney World in 1998 went nowhere due to safety concerns.  Says a woeful Gardyev, “They don’t have characteristics that would allow an ordinary person to use them…. [using the shoes involves] taking certain risks.  They should work like a Kalashnikov.  Reliable in anybody’s hands.”

Still, hopefully the U.S. military and/or investors might find some promise in the shoes.  The future remains wide open.

Next up is the rocket pack.  The rocket belt was originally invented in the 1960s by researcher William Suitor at Bell Aerosystems.  The pack had a 21 second fuel limit, as well as weight restrictions, rendering it mostly useless.  The first test flight was made by pioneer aviator Herald Graham in 1961.

After decades of little progress, a new company, Go Fast Sports and Beverage Company, is designing and marketing improved jetpacks.  Their latest model will retail at $200,000, will have a flight time of 9 minutes, a maximum speed of 85 MPH, a service ceiling of 250 ft, and a pilot weight limit of 180 lbs.  It is estimated that it will allow you to fly 11 miles on its 5-gallon tank and is powered by a T-73 turbine engine.  As pilot Troy Widgery says, who tested the pack at a recent arena show, “Not bad.”

While the pack obviously would not be sufficient for flight and additional weight tolerance would be needed to handle the 100+ lbs from the exoskeleton and other apparatus (boots), it would at least get you in the air and allow you to briefly hover.

Need to really fly like a jet, like Iron Man?  That’s where the third and fourth inventions this article details comes in.  French inventor Yves Rossy, a former Swiss jet fighter pilot, and current commercial pilot has invented a human-mounted mini jet, earning him the title “Fusion Man”.

The jet features carbon fiber wings spanning 2.5 m, with four mini jet engines using kerosene fuel.  The engines have reached speeds of 190 MPH over the Swiss Alps, after a 8,000 ft jump out a plane.

The wings helped him fly for over 4 minutes, landing by parachute.  Rossy describes it in French stating, roughly, “It’s like there’s a big handle in your back, and the good Lord takes you by it and shoves you through the air, it’s fantastic!!”

At a recent demonstration flight for CNN.com he elated, “It’s one thing to do it on one’s own, but to be able to share it live today that’s extraordinary.”

Rossy plans to use the wings to cross the English Channel next year.

Finnish inventors first developed the wing suit, allow men to glide along through the air.  The company that produces the suits Birdman Inc. has launched a new project, the Birdman Rocket Team.  Their lead pilot Visa Parviainen in 2005 and since has donned rocket boots for test flights.  The two jet engines attach burn a butane/propane mix, at a rate of half a liter per minute.  They provide 16kgs of thrust.

The engines allow level flights as well as climbing.  Stalls are no problem to recover from for the skilled pilot, such as Parviainen, thanks to the agility of the human body.  Flights could last half a minute or more at high speeds.

While the Russian Rocket boots, the Go Fast Jetpack, the Jet Man wings, and the Finnish Bird suit/rocket boots represent disparate inventions that would add extra weight and complexity, if combined, together perhaps their successors could combine to provide an exoskeleton with flight capabilities, much like Iron Man in the movies.  It certainly wouldn’t be cheap, and obviously the extra weight from the exoskeleton would be extremely difficult to compensate for but the rate of recent advances its look more and more doable.  Here’s hoping.


Taken From : dailytech.com

Apple Shows Strong Growth, Captures Two-thirds of $1k+ PC Market

The Apple monster keeps sating its appetite for growth on the pc retail market

Somewhere, Apple CEO Steve Jobs must be smiling.  The iconic and controversial electronics figure, rarely skips a beat in his tireless promotion of the Mac computer.  Q1 2008 also brought some very impressive numbers for Apple.

This time it wasn’t Jobs who was hailing the Mac’s market turnaround, but NPD, fresh off their latest number crunching.  In Q1 2008, Macs overall took 14 percent of the market for personal computers, and took a whopping 66 percent of the lucrative $1,000+ personal computer market.  On the desktop side of things, Apple owned a 14 percent overall retail share, and 70 percent share of the $1,000+ sales.  For notebooks, the sales were 14 percent and 64 percent respectively.

Stephen Baker, NPD’s vice president of industry analysis pats Apple on the back for its impressive numbers and gives a stick to Windows PC makers.  He states, “In notebooks [Apple is] growing two times the market; Windows notebooks are pretty much flat right now.”

Apple notebooks, according to Baker, are up 50 to 60 percent from Q1 of last year, while Windows notebooks show virtually zero percent growth.  On the desktop side of things, Baker states, “They’re up 45 percent.  The [overall] market is down 20 percent. Windows desktops would be down 25 percent.”

Baker comment glibly, “iMacs are growing and the Windows desktop ain’t. No matter how you look at it, Apple is outperforming Windows.”

Some would be quick to point the finger at Microsoft and Windows Vista.  Vista has earned substantial criticism, though some supporters ardently defend it.  However, love it or hate it, Baker doesn’t think Vista is a big factor.  He states, “I don’t believe that Vista’s to blame.  The vast majority of consumers don’t care [about the installed operating system].”

What is the key to the Mac’s success, particularly in the high-end market?  Baker says part of it is due to the fact that, besides the Mac Mini, all Mac’s are priced at over $1,000.  Baker states, “If you don’t give people a choice, people will spend more.”

He sees the growth of Mac sales as a sign of consumers making emotional decisions.  He argues that the average consumer doesn’t care so much about features, but cares more about how they feel the overall experience of the computer will be.  He states, “Consumers don’t care about features.  People see a value proposition in an offering that gives them a great experience.”

Baker also says that Apple is cashing in via improved retail store presence, including benefits from increased business at its own stores.  He says, “Apple has got better distribution than it’s had in the last 15 years.  They’re in the right spot right now. There’s the iPod advantage. But the big thing is the stores.”

Apple stores, he says make the customer feel like they are the recipient of individual attention.  Says Baker, “What Apple drives home: This is a product that we own from factory to finger.  We exert some control so that you get the best experience. When you get in the store, we get you what you want.”

The next logical question, Baker says is, “[Apple has] already won when somebody comes into the Apple Store.  How does it play in places where they’re not the only answer? How big a handicap is Windows?”

Therein lays the key to Apple’s success in Baker’s mind — “captive channels”.  He advocates that if Microsoft hopes to remain successful it should follow in suit, opening at least a small chain of Microsoft stores.  He states, offering an analogy to the fashion industry, “In a multi-channel environment you should have some kind of owned–and operated–channel as well.  When you look at Coach they have their own showcase stores as well.”

Apple’s strong sales will likely be fodder for more debate among detractors and fans.  However, Baker provides an interesting third-party perspective from the firm watching all the numbers.  While his suggestion of a Microsoft store certainly seems outlandish, stranger things have happened.

Next-gen NVIDIA GeForce Specifications Unveiled

NVIDIA’s upcoming Summer 2008 lineup gets some additional details

Later this week NVIDIA will enact an embargo on its upcoming next-generation graphics core, codenamed D10U.  The launch schedule of this processor, verified by DailyTech, claims the GPU will make its debut as two separate graphics cards, currently named GeForce GTX 280 (D10U-30) and GeForce GTX 260 (D10U-20).

The GTX 280 enables all features of the D10U processor; the GTX 260 version will consist of a significantly cut-down version of the same GPU.  The D10U-30 will enable all 240 unified stream processors designed into the processor.  NVIDIA documentation claims these second-generation unified shaders perform 50 percent better than the shaders found on the D9 cards released earlier this year.

The main difference between the two new GeForce GTX variants revolves around the number of shaders and memory bus width.  Most importantly, NVIDIA disables 48 stream processors on the GTX 260. GTX 280 ships with a 512-bit memory bus capable of supporting 1GB GDDR3 memory; the GTX 260 alternative has a 448-bit bus with support for 896MB.

GTX 280 and 260 add virtually all of the same features as GeForce 9800GTX: PCIe 2.0, OpenGL 2.1, SLI and PureVideoHD.  The company also claims both cards will support two SLI-risers for 3-way SLI support.

Unlike the upcoming AMD Radeon 4000 series, currently scheduled to launch in early June, the D10U chipset does not support DirectX extentions above 10.0.  Next-generation Radeon will also ship with GDDR5 while the June GeForce refresh is confined to just GDDR3.

The GTX series is NVIDIA’s first attempt at incorporating the PhysX stream engine into the D10U shader engine.  The press decks currently do not shed a lot of information on this support, and the company will likely not elaborate on this before the June 18 launch date.

After NVIDIA purchased PhysX developer AGEIA in February 2008, the company announced all CUDA-enabled processors would support PhysX.  NVIDIA has not delivered on this promise yet, though D10U will support CUDA, and therefore PhysX, right out of the gate.

NVIDIA’s documentation does not list an estimated street price for the new cards.

Halo dunia!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!


 

Januari 2012
S S R K J S M
« Mei    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Ikuti

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.